Trouble with the Locals: the Swing Riots and Repression
By 1841, Marlborough was already suffering from severe social and economic problems. In November 1830 it had been at the centre of the last great labourers’ revolt, better known as the Swing Riots, when half-starved agricultural labourers rioted and destroyed threshing machines that were depriving them of essential winter work. Incendiary fires were started on the hayricks of farms where the owners were known to be hostile or unsympathetic to the labourers’ plight. On 22nd November special constables were sworn in at a meeting held at the Duke’s Arms Inn in Marlborough. The disturbances were eventually suppressed by a combination of mounted yeomanry and special constables organized by the landowners.
Amongst numerous incidents, on 23rd November 1830, a crowd of working people came to blows with the forces of law and order at Rockley. They were intent on destroying the threshing machines at Temple Farm. During the affray Oliver Codrington, a special constable from Marlborough, was struck and wounded by a hammer thrown by one of the rioters, Peter Withers a 23 year old blacksmith from Ogbourne St Andrew. A county magistrate Thomas Baskerville, who was involved in the disturbance at Rockley, is cited as seconding a resolution to immediately ask for help from Bow Street to investigate the causes of fires. Requests were also made for troops to be sent to the neighbourhood and rewards offered for information leading to the conviction of fire-raisers.
Of the 339 cases heard at the Salisbury special commission in January 1831, 152 resulted in transportation to the penal colonies in Australia, more than from any other county. Peter Withers was sentenced to death. It emerged in court that Codrington had been only slightly injured and the hammer which struck him had been thrown by Withers after a ferocious attack by Codrington with a hunting whip loaded with iron at the end. Despite facing exile or, in Withers’ case death, the rioters stood up to their accusers in court. Comparing the bearing of the Wiltshire rioters with the Hampshire rioters at the Special Commission in Winchester, the special correspondent of the “Times” newspaper reported,
The prisoners here turn to the witnesses against them with a bold and confident air: cross-examine them, and contradict their answers, with a confidence and a want of common courtesy, in terms of which comparatively few instances occurred in the neighbouring county.
Withers had his sentence commuted to transportation for life. Sadly, he never saw his wife and five children again.
The difficulties didn’t end with the Swing Riots. Poverty and lawlessness continued to be major problems. When the Marlborough Workhouse was built at the top of Hyde Lane in 1837, poverty itself seemed to have been made into a crime. Perhaps it is no surprise that Wiltshire had the first County Constabulary in the country; established in Devizes in 1839.
The workhouse had been built as a result of the 1834 poor law amendment act which had, as its main object, the ending of outdoor relief to the able-bodied poor. The Swing Riots of 1830 had been a spontaneous outburst by agricultural labourers against rural poverty. It is unsurprising, in the wake of these unprecedented outbreaks, that the government wanted to end the problem of rural poverty once and for all.
The workhouse system, which emerged from the poor law amendment act, was made possible by the amalgamation of parishes into poor law unions for the purpose of administering poor relief. One workhouse would, in future, serve the needs of many parishes. The poor rate raised would be sufficient to build and maintain this workhouse. The Marlborough union included 14 parishes, all of which sent guardians to weekly meetings.
The Marlborough union workhouse’s early years were fraught with difficulties as it was bitterly resented by the local poor. A riot in January 1849 resulted in the kitchen being wrecked and windows smashed. A meeting on 10th January revealed the extent to which the guardians had lost control,
The Guardians present inspected the damage done in the kitchen and other places by the able bodied inmates. Ordered that the windows be mended by rough Boarding or in such other manner as shall protect the inmates of the house (except those in the able bodied Men’s Ward) from the inclemency of the present weather and season but the board will not incur any expenses however trifling in reinstating either the present or any future wilful damage that may be done to the House by the inmates until proper protection is afforded to the officers and property of the Union by the punishment of the offenders and the due enforcement of discipline.
It is significant that the windows in the able bodied men’s ward were to be left un-boarded. As it was the middle of winter, this was presumably to serve as a punishment to those who had rioted. Control was tightened as the 19th century progressed, but it was obvious that the workhouse continued to be hated and resented. The rioters of 1849, by the destruction of property, were reacting to poverty in a similar way to the Swing rioters of 1830.
Marlborough Union Workhouse survives today as a much renovated complex of retirement homes. The original plaque still bears the name of the builder and architect as well as the word “workhouse”, which the developer erased in 1998 but was ordered by Kennet District Council to re-instate. Local people had complained that the past was being wiped out as the real history of this place was being deliberately concealed.. The symmetrical courtyards, the radiating wings, and, most significantly, the imposing panopticon rising above the entire building and commanding views of every part of every courtyard, mark the workhouse as essentially a prison. As a monument to social history, it marks and commemorates the grinding poverty of past times and the reaction of political authority to it. The poor law guardians were responding to a national law: it was not their idea to build a workhouse. As such, this building possesses a national significance in British social and public history.
Yet this building has a still deeper, more profound significance. Even main-stream histories acknowledge a link between the Swing Riots and the poor law amendment act. As far as reform of the poor law was concerned,
The agrarian disturbances of 1830 brought matters to a head.
The workhouses were built as engines of social control. Their function was to ensure that those in poverty would be segregated from the rest of society and, therefore, unable to participate in the kinds of challenges to law and order as had been so recently seen in the desperate events of 1830. The Marlborough union workhouse building memorialises those events and the people caught up in them: it is a reminder to the social injustice and poverty of those times.